Comments on: IP Address Locator Update http://blog.anthonychaves.net/2006/11/14/ip-address-locator-update-2/ Life is software and jujitsu Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:22:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Anthony Chaves http://blog.anthonychaves.net/2006/11/14/ip-address-locator-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Anthony Chaves Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:28:06 +0000 http://blog.anthonychaves.net/java/2006/11/14/ip-address-locator-update-2#comment-7 Hi Brian, I didn't mean to suggest you said double-checked locking was a good idea, only that I enjoyed your talks where the Java 5 volatile keyword changes were discussed. The implemenation that I was thinking of would have declared the unique instance as volatile so your name came to mind. Thanks for reading my site! Hi Brian,

I didn’t mean to suggest you said double-checked locking was a good idea, only that I enjoyed your talks where the Java 5 volatile keyword changes were discussed. The implemenation that I was thinking of would have declared the unique instance as volatile so your name came to mind.

Thanks for reading my site!

]]> By: Brian Goetz http://blog.anthonychaves.net/2006/11/14/ip-address-locator-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Brian Goetz Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:05:55 +0000 http://blog.anthonychaves.net/java/2006/11/14/ip-address-locator-update-2#comment-6 Hmm, I'm absolutely sure I've never suggested any form of double-checked locking was a good idea, even if it does "work" with volatile under the new memory model. There are, as you suggest, better choices. Hmm, I’m absolutely sure I’ve never suggested any form of double-checked locking was a good idea, even if it does “work” with volatile under the new memory model. There are, as you suggest, better choices.

]]>